On Tue, Aug 03, 2004 at 04:36:18PM -0700, Bill Moseley said:
> So what does that mean? Does it mean that I *did* have a reject cache
> entry back on July 18th but it is now gone? Or is it truly a bug in
> Exim that's causing it to report a failure due to the cache yet
> there's not cache entry.
I thought I saw:
> rejectlog.12.gz:2004-07-14 23:38:54 H=(minotaur.apache.org)
> [209.237.227.194] sender verify fail for
> <dev-return-8076-apmail-moseley=apache.org@???>: response
> to "HELO hank.org" from mail.apache.org [209.237.227.199] was: 503 MAIL
> first
Note that that is July 14 - you certainly could have had a callout
cached on the 18th, if that's the case. And since the reject was for
HELO, everything from that domain was (improperly? - eye of the
beholder, I guess) cached as a reject.
--
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Stephen Gran | Drop the vase and it will become a Ming |
| steve@??? | of the past. -- The Adventurer |
| http://www.lobefin.net/~steve | |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
