> Nice to hear someone is actually using that thing ;)
Seem to be very clever and "just what i need".. Never got DCC to interface
with spamassassin properly sooo..
> Yup, I just upgraded to exim-4.40 myself and got the same problem.
> Apparently the "\n" I was adding to the X-DCC header isn't necessary
anymore and adds an unwanted blank line to the header. I've removed it and
it seems working with exim-4.40.
>
> You can fetch the fixed version at the same url:
http://www.physicman.net/projects/exim/
>
> Please let me know if you encounter other problems.
Compiles clean, delivers clean, but doesnt seem to tag anything? It did with
the "broken" version.
Here is the exim.conf settings
begin local_scan
socket = /var/dcc/dccifd
reject_message = Probable spam. Rejected.
# End of Exim configuration file
Here is the source of a processed message
Return-path: <root@???>
Envelope-to: j2@???
Delivery-date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 11:09:02 +0200
Received: from scanmupp.adm.gu.se ([130.241.25.165] helo=statler.mupp.net)
by cookiemonster.mupp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.34)
id 1BmU8Z-0005X3-6Z
for j2@???; Mon, 19 Jul 2004 11:08:43 +0200
Received: from scooter.mupp.net ([213.212.33.23])
by statler.mupp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.40)
id 1BmU8Y-0001MB-NM
for j2@???; Mon, 19 Jul 2004 11:08:42 +0200
Received: from root by scooter.mupp.net with local (Exim 4.34 and XAMS
0.0.15)
id 1BmU8Y-00083w-4P
for j2@???; Mon, 19 Jul 2004 11:08:42 +0200
To: j2@???
Message-Id: <E1BmU8Y-00083w-4P@???>
From: root <root@???>
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 11:08:42 +0200
X-mupp.net-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: root@???
test
