Andreas Metzler wrote:
> BTW a documentation update is called for. libspf_alt is no more,
> http://www.midwestcs.com/spf/libspf-alt/ automatically redirects to
> http://libspf2.org/.
Yes, I also have the disturbing feeling that SPF/SRS is a rapidly moving
target. :) Thanks for the info.
> I wonder whether it would not be better to beat the patch autors
> repeatedly on the head to force them to unify their interface before
> giving one of them semi-official status by including it in exiscan.
I chose -alt because -non-alt wanted me to look at a patch for qmail to
learn about the API. *YUKK*
> (I do not like the fact that libsrs_alt requires OpenSSL to compile)
I guess it only uses some hashing algorithms, maybe they can be
implemented natively in the future.
regards,
/tom
