On Thursday, July 15, 2004 12:52 PM exim-users-admin@??? wrote:
> I think we've discussed this on the list before, but I'm
> increasingly convinced that acl_smtp_predata would be a
> useful.
Never thought about this myself...
> (2) There are situations in which you might want to say that
> an address is OK from the point of view of a callout but not
> from the point of view of actually sending a message.
Indeeeed!
> (3) One of the tests we do in the RCPT ACL is to check if
> MailScanner is keeping up with the load and defer if it
> isn't. It'd be better to do this once at predata time.
