Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
>Christian Balzer wrote:
>
>> Nice one, but it breaks (like all schemes with timestamps in them)
>> greylisting.
>
>Sounds like a feature rather than a bug to me.
>
If each and every mail to an user utilizing greylisting being
artificially delayed (instead of just the first one) is a feature,
then certainly yes.
Did I miss some long, shrill and painful thread where greylisting
was branded as another bane of the internot like SPF or callout
verifications? (and for the record, I would agree with that assessment
for the later two, in varying degrees though)
Regards,
Christian Balzer
--
Christian Balzer Network/Systems Engineer NOC
chibi@??? Global OnLine Japan/Fusion Network Services
http://www.gol.com/
