Re: [Exim] Final Peer Review Sought: "Spam Filtering for MXs…

On Jul 9, 2004, at 01:59, Matthew Byng-Maddick wrote:

> This shouldn't be "hash_8", it should be something more along the
> lines of:

Any particular reason?

Note that for this purpose, I am not neccessarily looking for a
cryptographically safe string - merely something that's hard to guess
by the spammer. Hashing over a string that contains a secret should
be more than enough, IMO.

I'd put more weight on simplicity.

-tor