On 2004-07-04 Andreas Metzler <eximusers@???> wrote:
> On 2004-07-04 j2 <spamfilter2@???> wrote:
> [...]
> > 26838 Connection request from 221.139.231.35 port 3425
> [...]
> > 26875 SMTP<< MAIL FROM:<smtp2001soho@???>
> > 26875 SMTP>> 250 OK
> > 26875 SMTP<< RCPT TO:<ksc-0110@???>
> > 26875 using ACL "acl_check_rcpt"
> [...]
> > 26875 processing "accept"
> > 26875 check hosts = +relay_from_hosts
> > 26875 host in "127.0.0.1 : ::::1 : 192.168.0.0/24"? yes (matched "::1")
> > 26875 host in "+relay_from_hosts"? yes (matched "+relay_from_hosts")
> > 26875 accept: condition test succeeded
> [...]
> > hostlist relay_from_hosts = 127.0.0.1 : ::::1 : 192.168.0.0/24
> [...]
> > accept hosts = +relay_from_hosts
> [...]
> This is scary and unreprodicible for me.
Actually I can reproduce it, if I rebuild exim without 'HAVE_IPV6=YES'
in EDITME. Seems to be a bug.
Building exim without IPv6 support and using IPV6 addresses in the
configuration file seems to be a rather strange idea, though.
cu andreas
--
"See, I told you they'd listen to Reason," [SPOILER] Svfurlr fnlf,
fuhggvat qbja gur juveyvat tha.
Neal Stephenson in "Snow Crash"
