Re: [Exim] Rfc 2821 par 4.1.4 is this still valid or was it…

Pàgina inicial
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Autor: Avleen Vig
Data:  
A: Giuliano Gavazzi
CC: Exim User's Mailing List
Assumpte: Re: [Exim] Rfc 2821 par 4.1.4 is this still valid or was it replace.
On Sat, Jul 03, 2004 at 10:16:01PM +0200, Giuliano Gavazzi wrote:
> >That's a fantastic interpretation of 2821.
> >3.6:
> >     -  The domain name given in the EHLO command MUST BE either a
> >    primary host name (a domain name that resolves to an A RR) or,
> >    if the host has no name, an address literal as described in
> >    section 4.1.1.1.

> >
> >It says nothing about resolving correctly as a PTR. In fact, that you
> >can give an address literal implies that IP addresses should not be
> >resolved back to a hostname.
>
> Greg hasn't mentioned or implied PTR records, indeed a "name"
> (hostname) does not have PTR records (with the exception of course of
> the IN-ADDR.ARPA zone).


Well, you can't look up an IP address to a hostname (reverse DNS)
unless it has a PTR record :-)

--
Avleen Vig
Systems Administrator
Doing virtual domain hosting with Exim?
  Check out Virtual Exim: http://silverwraith.com/vexim
    (Click the banner, support development..)