Re: [Exim] Rfc 2821 par 4.1.4 is this still valid or was it…

Góra strony
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Autor: Avleen Vig
Data:  
Dla: Exim User's Mailing List
CC: lists
Temat: Re: [Exim] Rfc 2821 par 4.1.4 is this still valid or was it replace.
On Sat, Jul 03, 2004 at 02:56:40PM -0400, Greg A. Woods wrote:
> The SMTP client "MUST" give its proper canonical hostname in the
> HELO/EHLO greeting (or a valid address literal). It "MUST NOT" lie and
> give some other name which does not resolve to the address it connects
> from.


That's a fantastic interpretation of 2821.
3.6:
     -  The domain name given in the EHLO command MUST BE either a
    primary host name (a domain name that resolves to an A RR) or,
    if the host has no name, an address literal as described in
    section 4.1.1.1.


It says nothing about resolving correctly as a PTR. In fact, that you
can give an address literal implies that IP addresses should not be
resolved back to a hostname.

--
Avleen Vig
Systems Administrator
Doing virtual domain hosting with Exim?
  Check out Virtual Exim: http://silverwraith.com/vexim
    (Click the banner, support development..)