Re: [Exim] Server response to error codes

On 28 Jun 2004 at 20:09, John W. Baxter wrote about

    "Re: [Exim] Server response to error":

|...
| Given the RFCs, I believe Exim has no choice but to say 503 in response to
| DATA if there were no valid recipients, pipelining or not.

Which language led you to that conclusion?

Based on a quick read of 2920 and 2821, ISTM that it's appropriate to
return 451 ("same sequence of commands may work later") to DATA when
you've returned 450 to some RCPTs. What did I miss?

- Fred