On Fri, 2004-06-25 at 12:28, xq@??? wrote:
> But i have also read some sites about comparison of MTA's, please read
> self:
> http://homepages.tesco.net/%7EJ.deBoynePollard/Reviews/UnixMTSes/
Most of whats written there has obviously not been checked or refers to
old exim versions. For example:-
* Web page comments are rubbish
* directors is exim3 which has been obsolete for ages
* scaling comments are reporting rumour with no backup
> and
> http://www.geocities.com/mailsoftware42/
Thats mostly garbage too:-
* Looks like its been written after a 5 minute look at debian
* Says its for exim 4.2 but all the links are to 3.2
* Security comments are way out of date
> there stand Exim will be unsecure and slow, on some boards i become the
> information it will not be 100% RFC-compliant - is that true?
RFC compliance is very high - but not 100% because you can configure to
not follow RFCs (eg HELO policy handling). Some RFCs are seriously
outdated in the current environment. Some are not implemented.
Nigel.
--
[ Nigel Metheringham Nigel.Metheringham@??? ]
[ - Comments in this message are my own and not ITO opinion/policy - ]
