Re: [Exim] require verify = header_syntax

Top Page
This message is part of the following thread:
Mthe complete thread tree sorted by date
MEdgar Lovecraft at <-
MIan A B Eiloart at ->
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Tony Finch
Date:  
To: Edgar Lovecraft
CC: exim-users
Subject: Re: [Exim] require verify = header_syntax
On Tue, 22 Jun 2004, Edgar Lovecraft wrote:
>
> Lots of problems with that on a large system, lots of MUA's are broken
> in this respect. The biggest problem is bad formations of 'Undisclosed
> Recipients' when all of the "to's" are in the BCC field.

Yes, we've had complaints about that too. We decided to be unsympathetic :-)

--
Tony Finch <dot@???> http://dotat.at/


This message was posted to the following mailing lists:
Exim-users
Mailing List Info | Nearby Messages		<-Re: [Exim] require verify = header_syntaxRE: [Exim] quota_warn_threshold specifics->
Tahini and Hummus and Cumin Development Archives administrated by cumin AdminsLurker (version 2.3)