Re: [Exim] debugging config

Alan J. Flavell wrote:
>
> > > I'm looking for a command line option to test that fully simulates >
> > receiving a message from a remote host,
> >
> > -bh
>
> With respect, that doesn't *fully* simulate, since it doesn't attempt
> callouts.
>
> There's a long-standing wishlist item for -bh to try a callout: it seems
> to me that it would at least be nice to have that as an option, even if
> it wasn't the default -bh behaviour.

-bhc

Why all the hardwork?

> I have a separate script (lashed-up and entirely unfit for public
> distribution, sorry) which I run when the occasion arises, which does an
> approximation to a callout, but I'm very well aware that in detail it
> will differ from what exim would do.
>
> ObCallout: Why -do- so many Chinese MTAs reject <> as envelope sender?
> It seems to be a national sport, almost.
>
> all the best
>

--

--EAL--