Re: [Exim] Using "authenticated = *"

Page principale
Supprimer ce message
Répondre à ce message
Auteur: Konrad Michels
Date:  
À: Exim-Users (E-mail)
Sujet: Re: [Exim] Using "authenticated = *"
Hi again folks
Just to let you know I figured out what the problem was in the end:
although I'm still a little puzzled as to why it was happening.

I have an:

accept authenticated = *

in my acl, ^followed^ by a

deny message = . . . . .
     dnslists =


which looks to the dnsbl's I'm using.

As far as I understood the ACL's order mattered, much like routers, so I
would have thought that if a message was coming in from an asmtp
session, it would get caught by the "accept authenticated = *" ACL and
proceed to routing and delivering the message.

This, however, does not seem to be the case! How I got it to work was
to ammend my dnsbl blocks to read something along the lines of

deny !authenticated = *
     message =  . . . .
     dnslists =  . . .


Somehow it still doesn't see right though that I have to specify it for
each of my dnsbl lookups . . .

Later
Konrad


On Tue, 2004-06-15 at 10:05, Konrad Michels wrote:
> Morning folks
> Just a quick public thanks to Nico for his input a week or two back into
> condition combining - it was very educational!
>
> I've got my new mail server up and running now - just migrated all the
> users across and just about everything is working: couple of niggles to
> sort out still, the most urgent of all being SMTP auth, which, while it
> is working (the auth part), my intention was to exempt all authenticated
> smtp connects from the ACL checks.
>
> Right now I'm doing the usual checks against one or two DNSBL's, which
> is, as expected, bouncing smtp connects appropriately. However, I'm
> also bouncing smtp connects from SMTP authenticated users, which was not
> my intention. From the manual, I gather I need to probably prefix my
> entire ACL section with something like:
>
> if !(authenticated = *)
>
> do I not?
>
> Or is it simply a question of putting "authenticated = *" in the config
> file? If I do this, will it not bounce all unauthenticated mail even
> from valid sources?
>
> Sorry for the fuzzy question: after a hectic day yesterday ironing out
> the changeover to the new machine I still was up every hour last night
> tending to my youngest and allegedly dearest bairn suffering from the
> excessive heat - things are not as clear this morning as they normally
> are, which is not all that clear at the best of times anyway . . . :-)
>
> Thanks for your time
> Konrad
>
>
>
> --
>
> ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ##
>