Steve Lamb <grey@???> writes:
> Ooooh, excellent! Now I'm curious to see if there would be a
> speed boost by shutting those tests off in SpamAssassin and letting
> Exim handle it.
It wouldn't make much difference, I guess. The results will be cached
in local caching DNS when SA asks for them. What can be more interesting
is that the weights must not be the same in pre-SA and SA-time (the tests
are slightly different, the ACL knows the peer's address while SA is basing
on the IPs found in Received: headers) and that you always can...
> [...] include that as a header for later bayes filters to chew on.
... or add it to the score generated by SA.
--
(-) Łukasz Grochal lukie [at] berdyczow.org
(PGP key / SSL cert at: )
_____________________________________________ http://www.berdyczow.org/ __
... all in all it's just another rule in the firewall. /Ping Flood/
