On 26 May 2004 at 10:26, David Woodhouse wrote about
"Re: [Exim] exiscan-acl-4.24-22 - SP":
| On Wed, 2004-05-26 at 11:24 +0200, Tom Kistner wrote:
| > David Woodhouse wrote:
|...
| > OK, but why is following a "fail" verdict silly? If a domain is so
| > strict that it wants non-authorized relays to fail, why can't we honor
| > that request?
|
| Because they have no right to make that request.
The administrator (and by proxy, owner) of a domain has no right to
determine how it is used? That strikes me as an extreme view.
- Fred
