Re: [Exim] exiscan-acl-4.24-22 - SPF support

David Woodhouse wrote:

>>OK, but why is following a "fail" verdict silly? If a domain is so
>>strict that it wants non-authorized relays to fail, why can't we honor
>>that request?
>
> Because they have no right to make that request.

I disagree. If the sending party wants to shoot itself in the foot, I'll
hand them the gun.

> If my users have a
> forward file they _authorised_ the forwarding of their email.

I thought that SRS should solve that problem? Or am I completely on the
wrong track? :)

/tom