Hi Matthew
In terms of accountability what's the difference between a 'whois' on
62.253.162.40 (smtp.ntlworld.com)
netnum: 62.253.160.0 - 62.253.167.255
netname: NTL
descr: NTL Internet
descr: Winnersh Datacentre
country: GB
admin-c: NNMC1-RIPE
tech-c: NNMC1-RIPE
status: ASSIGNED PA
mnt-by: AS5089-MNT
changed: hostmaster@??? 20010108
changed: hostmaster@??? 20020815
source: RIPE
role: NTLI Network Management Centre
address: NTL Internet
address: Crawley Court
address: Winchester
address: Hampshire
address: SO21 2QA
trouble: -------------------------------------------------------
trouble: For abuse notifications please -
trouble: file an online case @
http://www.ntlworld.com/netreport
trouble: +44 2920 305142
trouble: -------------------------------------------------------
trouble: For peering issues/requests please -
trouble: email : peering@???
trouble: -------------------------------------------------------
And a 'whois' on my IP
inetnum: 81.106.240.0 - 81.106.255.255
netname: NTL
descr: NTL Infrastructure - Cardiff
country: GB
admin-c: NNMC1-RIPE
tech-c: NNMC1-RIPE
status: ASSIGNED PA
mnt-by: AS5089-MNT
remarks: INFRA-AW
changed: hostmaster@??? 20030123
source: RIPE
role: NTLI Network Management Centre
address: NTL Internet
address: Crawley Court
address: Winchester
address: Hampshire
address: SO21 2QA
trouble: -------------------------------------------------------
trouble: For abuse notifications please -
trouble: file an online case @
http://www.ntlworld.com/netreport
trouble: +44 2920 305142
trouble: -------------------------------------------------------
trouble: For peering issues/requests please -
trouble: email : peering@???
remembered not to hit 'reply all' this time :-)
--
Mike 'Fraz' White
www.smartowner.co.uk
> -----Original Message-----
> From: exim-users-admin@??? [mailto:exim-users-admin@exim.org] On
> Behalf Of Matthew Byng-Maddick
> Sent: 18 May 2004 10:13
> To: exim-users@???
> Subject: Re: [Exim] BACKUP smart host?
>
> On Tue, May 18, 2004 at 09:06:49PM +1200, Juha Saarinen wrote:
> > Business ones aren't necessarily any better than residential
connections
> > either, unfortunately, so the OP isn't wrong in running an email
system
> > off a residential line.
>
> Accountability is the one thing you missed.
>
> MBM
>
> (and please don't courtesy copy me)
>
> --
> Matthew Byng-Maddick <mbm@???>
> http://colondot.net/
> (Please use this address to reply)
>
> --
>
> ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
Exim
> details at http://www.exim.org/ ##
