--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
Thanks. I have really only used spamassassin directly queried from
exim. I hope it is as efficient.
Mark.
On Fri, 2004-05-14 at 12:53, Richard Welty wrote:
> On Fri, 14 May 2004 12:35:30 -0500 Mark Seamans <mark@???> wrote:
>
> > --
> > [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
> > Once again I have researched my butt off...no luck.
>
> > I host several domains. Customers are starting to request the ability
> > to review mail, destined for their domain that was rejected due to spam.
>
> > If anyone has a config of a rule/acl that would redirect typically
> > rejected spam to a single mailbox per domain -or- deliver to a special
> > folder per user for webmail access.
>
> > Of course there would need to be a mechanism to flush this out based on
> > age.
>
> you may wish to install a generalized system to manage this stuff; for example,
> if you install dspam, then each mailbox will have its own quarantine for
> probable spam with a web GUI (written in perl) to allow them to review
> stuff dspam trapped.
>
> dspam is a bayesan filter, with all the training that requires, but the current
> version has some provisions for sitewide sharing of training, and it appears
> that training dspam with the spamassassin corpus provides dspam with a
> very good first cut.
>
> richard
> --
> Richard Welty rwelty@???
> Averill Park Networking 518-573-7592
> Java, PHP, PostgreSQL, Unix, Linux, IP Network Engineering, Security
>
>
> --
>
> ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ##
>
--
