Re: [Exim] delay after DATA

Ian A B Eiloart <iane@???> wrote:
>> That isn't the beneficial effect, though. It's a side-effect.
>>
>>> probably do wait during the transaction, I doubt they bother after
>>> they've sent the final dot..
>>
>> Indeed.
>>
>> MBM
>
> Well, they might be interested to see whether their mail is accepted,
> but they might not. What can be done in the latter case?
>
> Is it possible to reject hosts that consistently don't wait? Or
> perhaps to impose a delay at the start of the NEXT connection that
> they make?

Interesting idea - you could probably knock up a log-tailing script which
spots the 'unexpected disconnection' entries and maintains a dbm file for
your ACLs to eat.

Peter