On Wed, May 05, 2004 at 03:13:57PM +0200, Michael Haardt wrote:
> > True, it was not meant to replace your patch 1:1. My problem is that I
> > must stay backwards compatible with existing configurations. What I can
> > offer in the next version is to expand the spamd_address option before
> > using it (each time "spam" is called). You can then use ACL variables to
> > have the a lookup return a different address set.
> Please don't. I suggested before to separate the code that communicates
> with spamd from the option parsing code. To stay compatible, first try
> to parse options using the old syntax. If that fails, parse the new
> syntax, whatever that may be. I suggest attribute-value pairs.
> That's both backward compatible and easy to use.
Tom's suggestion is, however, more in the spirit of the rest of exim's
current configuration philosophy.
MBM
--
Matthew Byng-Maddick <mbm@???> http://colondot.net/
(Please use this address to reply)
