On Wed, 2004-05-05 at 12:05, Alan J. Flavell wrote:
> Does the team think this is a reasonable thing to do? Is the message
> clear enough? Am I missing some unexpected knock-on effect? Sure,
> we'll now also repudiate this address if a callout is attempted for
> it, but as it's only active for receipt of mail (viz. mail which has
> non-null envelope sender), and never actually sends anything, this
> seems to me to be not only harmless, but possibly even beneficial, no?
Seems fine to me - I do similar, for example the list handling router
rejects messages to the list address (not the admin/request etc
addresses) with a null sender.
Nigel.
--
[ Nigel Metheringham Nigel.Metheringham@??? ]
[ - Comments in this message are my own and not ITO opinion/policy - ]
