Edgar Lovecraft wrote:
> Brian wrote:
>
>>In my configure file for exim, the acl_smtp_rcpt I have an acl called
>>acl_check_rcpt. In there after a forged HELO check, and the %!
>>local_parts check, I have this:
>> require verify = sender
>> message = Unrouteable sender domain
>
>
> require verify = sender/callout=15s
>
>
> ..[snip]...
> RTFM Section 38.20-38.25:
> http://www.exim.org/exim-html-4.30/doc/html/spec_38.html#SECT38.20
So if after reading I think that..
verify = sender/callout=10s/defer_ok
means..
that if in 10seconds I can't verify the senders domain, that it's ok to
defer this host right?
if so what's the difference in the other example listed:
verify = recipient/defer_ok/callout=10s,defer_ok
why is defer_ok listed twice, or why is the second defer_ok not an
option to verify, but rather an option to callout?
..
2004-04-29 11:38:21 H=h000102917370.ne.client2.attbi.com
(hotmailcentral.com) [24.91.97.186] sender verify fail for
<bgdpusfk@???>: response to "RCPT
TO:<bgdpusfk@???>" from sacbeemailsmtp2.prontomail.com
[207.183.238.67] was: 550 5.1.2 <bgdpusfk@???>... Invalid
Recipient
2004-04-29 11:38:21 H=h000102917370.ne.client2.attbi.com
(hotmailcentral.com) [24.91.97.186] F=<bgdpusfk@???> rejected
RCPT <info@???>: Sender verify failed
2004-04-29 11:38:22 H=h000102917370.ne.client2.attbi.com
(hotmailcentral.com) [24.91.97.186] sender verify fail for
<bgdpusfk@???>
2004-04-29 11:38:22 H=h000102917370.ne.client2.attbi.com
(hotmailcentral.com) [24.91.97.186] F=<bgdpusfk@???> rejected
RCPT <info@???>: Sender verify failed
2004-04-29 11:38:22 H=h000102917370.ne.client2.attbi.com
(hotmailcentral.com) [24.91.97.186] sender verify fail for
<bgdpusfk@???>
2004-04-29 11:38:22 H=h000102917370.ne.client2.attbi.com
(hotmailcentral.com) [24.91.97.186] F=<bgdpusfk@???> rejected
RCPT <info@???>: Sender verify failed
2004-04-29 11:38:22 unexpected disconnection while reading SMTP command
from h000102917370.ne.client2.attbi.com (hotmailcentral.com) [24.91.97.186]
I have just gotten an entry like this in my logs.. and it doesn't make
sense.. as does this one..
2004-04-29 11:42:14 H=(63.109.236.156) [200.162.36.146] sender verify
fail for <HEPALJCRRWKHFZ@???>: response to "RCPT
TO:<HEPALJCRRWKHFZ@???>" from mx1.hotmail.com [65.54.252.99]
was: 550 Requested action not taken: mailbox unavailable
2004-04-29 11:42:14 H=(63.109.236.156) [200.162.36.146]
F=<HEPALJCRRWKHFZ@???> rejected RCPT <validuser@???>:
Sender verify failed
Why do they say sender verify failed?
- Brian
.. anyone get this?