brian@??? wrote:
> Anyone?
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <brian@???>
> To: "Dickenson, Steven" <sdickenson@???>
> Cc: <exim-users@???>
> Sent: Friday, April 23, 2004 7:52 PM
> Subject: Re: [Exim] Exim & Spamassassin Woes
>
>
>
>>Any ideas as to why i can't send/receive mail externally?
>>
>>----- Original Message -----
>>From: "Dickenson, Steven" <sdickenson@???>
>>To: <brian@???>
>>Cc: <exim-users@???>
>>Sent: Friday, April 23, 2004 7:42 PM
>>Subject: RE: [Exim] Exim & Spamassassin Woes
>>
>>
>>
>>>Dan Egli wrote:
>>>
>>>>Your headers indicate that the message was passed through
>>>>SpamAssassin, and scored a 1.4, and thus is not a spam. If a message
>>>>is rejected, I think it just gets nuked. I have never used
>>>>SpamAssassin except through SA-Exim which does things radically
>>>>differently.
>>>
>>>This setup does nothing with the message other than scan it for spam and
>>
>>put
>>
>>>it back through the routers (this time with a received protocol set).
>
> It
>
>>is
>>
>>>then up to your other routers to handle the message. Provided you have
>>>normal delivery setup with no filters of any kind, spam-tagged messages
>>>should still go to your inbox.
>>>
>>>Steven
>>>---
>>>Steven Dickenson <sdickenson@???>
>>>Network Administrator
>>>The Key School, Annapolis Maryland
>>>
>>>--
>>>
>>>## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users Exim
>>
>>details at http://www.exim.org/ ##
>>
>>>
>
>
> --
>
> ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ##
>
>
Try tracing it. Does it get past your SpamAssassin?
Like I said I'm totally unfamiliar with this setup. If you were using
SA-Exim I could help a lot easier.
--- Dan
--
-- Dan
