Re: [Exim] RFC2920 and synchronization errors

On Thu, 22 Apr 2004, Matthew Byng-Maddick wrote:
>
> Yes, but at no point does it explicitly say that a command group terminator
> MUST wait for a response. Please point out the part where it says this. It
> only says that it must be the end of a TCP send operation.

It's implicit in the state-transition business, e.g. the way the client
has to handle DATA, and the mention that NOOP is a synchronization point.
Yes it could be clearer.

--
Tony Finch <dot@???> http://dotat.at/