RE: [Exim] exiscan-acl-4.32-18

Tom Kistner wrote:
> Dickenson, Steven wrote:
>
>> Nice! So if clamav or spamd has gone to sleep with the fishes, and
>> the exiscan callout errors out, the ACL will not fail?
>
> Yes. Errrm no. It will fail instead of defer, passing on to the next
> ACL statement block. Which is what you want :)
>
> ("fail" here means: do not carry out the block action ... which is
> usually "deny" or "discard" with malware).

Oh right. Ummm, I meant to say that... ;)

Steven
---
Steven Dickenson <sdickenson@???>
Network Administrator
The Key School, Annapolis Maryland