On Tue, 20 Apr 2004, T. Horsnell (tsh) wrote:
> >> Support for: iconv() OpenSSL
> > ^^^^^^^
> > ^^^^^^^
> >There's your TLS support!!
>
> Ah. OK. I was expecting something like "SUPPORT_TLS"
There's more than one possibility, you see. It either says "OpenSSL" or
"GnuTLS".
> int getsockname(
> int socket,
> struct sockaddr *address,
> socklen_t *address_len );
That's the standard definition.
> [XNS4.0] The definition of the getsockname() function in XNS4.0 uses a
> size_t data type instead of a socklen_t data type as specified in XNS5.0
> (the previous definition).
>
> [Tru64 UNIX] The following definition of the getsockname() function does
> not conform to current standards and is supported only for backward compa-
> tibility (see standards(5)):
>
> #include <sys/socket.h>
>
> int getsockname(
> int socket,
> struct sockaddr *address,
> int *address_len );
Aha! That's where it says "int", and I guess that's what was seen while
you were compiling. I *could* change the Exim source, but would this be
right for all OSF1 systems? I have no idea. Any OSF1 experts reading
this?
--
Philip Hazel University of Cambridge Computing Service,
ph10@??? Cambridge, England. Phone: +44 1223 334714.
Get the Exim 4 book: http://www.uit.co.uk/exim-book
