On Mon, Apr 05, 2004 at 11:50:56AM +0100, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 05, 2004 at 11:40:43AM +0100, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> > a) Exim is now using the original sender address rather than <>
> > to do callouts
> > b) Exim is not distinguishing between a rejection of the MAIL
> > and RCPT verbs in the context of recipient verification
> Erm, of course b) is slightly incorrect. The rejection is happening at
> the RCPT stage, because that's when the callout is happening. The
> problem is entirely point a). Which is a big problem.
Not doing it is also a big problem, especially with certain addresses
configured not to accept bounces (because they should never be sending
mail). Really you want to be cacheing the tuple, I think.
MBM
--
Matthew Byng-Maddick <mbm@???> http://colondot.net/
