lør, 03.04.2004 kl. 21.24 skrev Mike Richardson:
> > My main argument would be that Exchange is not suitable for smtp mail.
> > Exchange is good for groupware; Microsoft should realize that it has to
> > develop and market a separate mail server.
>
> To be fair to MS (not something they are likely to be in return) they
> aren't they only company guilty of this. Oracle are almost as bad.
> The problem, as I see it, is that they, as a company, do not (want to)
> see things from a mail administrators point of view. They see their
> product from a business PoV, a DBA PoV and a users PoV. MS are guilty
> of the former and latter.
>
> What we have to do, as mail admins, behind the scenes does not really seem
> to concern anyone as long as their shiny system works*.
You forgot Novell. I know what you mean. It *is* shiny, bright, alluring
and promises even better things to come.
--Tonni
--
mail: billy - at - billy.demon.nl
http://www.billy.demon.nl
