> No, really, don't do that. The "nobody" user is supposed to have > absolutely no priveleges. That's the whole point of it.
I did and it worked. As of linux, nobody may be intended to have no
priveleges, but in fact it has the some as any other user has. Nobody
can simply be "nobody". Please explain how any any user or any service
running at a different userid shall get nobody-privileges?
