Re: [Exim] spamc and exim

Bruce Richardson <itsbruce@???> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 22, 2004 at 07:09:29AM -0000, Peter Bowyer wrote:
>>> I don't quite understand what you are telling the guy here. His
>>> rules are correct! His problems are elsewere, really.
>>
>> No, they're not.
>
> Yes, they are. I shouldn't answer questions in the early hours of the
> morning when my brain isn't in gear. His problem was that he had a
> whole succession of "warn... spam...' lines in his acl but only
> applied a size check to one of them (not even the first, which would
> have made some kind of sense, at least).

Agreed. I supported Bruce's method because I've done it that way in the
past.... but I agree that the OP's original problem is as outlined here.

Peter