Re: [Exim] spamc and exim

Inizio della pagina
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Autore: Andreas Metzler
Data:  
To: exim-users
Oggetto: Re: [Exim] spamc and exim
On 2004-03-22 Peter Bowyer <peter@???> wrote:
> Odhiambo G. Washington <wash@???> wrote:
> > * Bruce Richardson <itsbruce@???> [20040321 18:04]: wrote:

[...]
> >>> warn    message        = X-Spam-Score: $spam_score ($spam_bar)
> >>>           condition      = ${if <{$message_size}{50k}{1}{0}}
> >>>           spam           = nobody:true

[...]
> > I don't quite understand what you are telling the guy here. His rules
> > are correct! His problems are elsewere, really.


> No, they're not. The 'condtion' clause in the ACL above doesn't control
> whether the message gets sent to SA or not


Sure it does.

Quoting exim specification:
| The positioning of the modifiers in an ACL statement important, because
| the processing of a verb ceases as soon as its outcome is known. Only
| those modifiers that have already been encountered will take effect.


If you do not believe /this/ check exiscan's documentation. The ACL above is
quoted almost verbatim from exiscan-acl-examples.txt.
         cu andreas, using a similar acl successfully.