On Thu, 2004-03-11 at 08:10, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Wed, 2004-03-10 at 13:37 +0000, Yann Golanski wrote:
> > > 3. One of my main concerns is that the documentation will get worse.
> >
> > Hear hear. We need to do make sure it does not get any worst and even
> > gets better.
>
> I wonder if we can automate this. Would it be possible to make a script
> to check that all options understood by Exim are also present in the
> documentation?
I've been wondering about some other checks - along the lines of
enforcing some form of reconciliation between bugzilla and
NewStuff/ChangeLog. Of course the hard part is enforcing the
appropriate and lucid transfer of NewStuff/ChangeLog -> main doc tree.
BTW I've been playing with graphviz, which would have the ability to
easily build up some of the flow diagrams in the documentation. However
I can't immediately see a way to do conversion of that into ascii art
diagrams :-(
Nigel.
--
[ Nigel Metheringham Nigel.Metheringham@??? ]
[ - Comments in this message are my own and not ITO opinion/policy - ]