On Tue, 24 Feb 2004, David Woodhouse wrote:
> > > Out of interest, do you happen to recall if did they explicitly _want_
> > > the old data repeated, or would 'return_path_on_delivery' have sufficed
> > > to satisfy them too?
> >
> > Can't remember.
>
> Now why doesn't that surprise me? :)
>
> T'was a rhetorical question with implicit suggestion.
No. I won't change it. I've been bitten too many times by that sort of
thing. I would rather add a new facility.
--
Philip Hazel University of Cambridge Computing Service,
ph10@??? Cambridge, England. Phone: +44 1223 334714.
Get the Exim 4 book: http://www.uit.co.uk/exim-book
