On Tue, 24 Feb 2004, David Woodhouse wrote:
> If I rewrite errors_to in a router, logging sender_on_delivery still
> reports the _original_ sender address, not the one we actually _used_ in
> the delivery.
But it is called SENDER_on_delivery. What you seem to be wanting is a
new selector called return_path_on_delivery. I'll WishList it.
> Is this a bug? Since it was already logged on receipt, it certainly
> seems rather pointless to allow us to log it _again_ if all we can do is
> repeat stale data.
I was specifically asked to add sender_on_delivery. I made the point
about repeating the data, but the requestor insisted that they wanted it
that way for some reason (probably to do with ease of processing the log
lines - after all, the <= line could be days ago).
--
Philip Hazel University of Cambridge Computing Service,
ph10@??? Cambridge, England. Phone: +44 1223 334714.
Get the Exim 4 book: http://www.uit.co.uk/exim-book
