RE: AW: [Exim] About this list

Hi

> > Just out of couriosity what is "reply-to" for? I don't write MUAs and
> > therefore haven't read all those RFCs, but I just assumed reply-to
> > would be the address to "reply to".
>
> Not when the it's the MTA replying. That would happen when your message
has bounced. The bounced message should go to the agent that sent it, not
some arbitrary address set in the "reply-to" header.

First, why didn't you send the answer to the list?

Second, okay. I talked about MUAs. I understand this for MTAs.

cu
Steffen