On Sat, 2004-01-31 at 13:46, David Woodhouse wrote:
> This is my experience too -- but Matthew reported that blocking messages
> without Message-ID 'caught only a small number of cases' though. I'm not
> really sure why; I suspect his incoming mail comes through a box which
> adds its own Message-ID, perhaps. Looking at the hostname in the
> Message-ID of the offending messages, and at the Received: headers,
> would shed some light on the reason.
If you are running an older exim it helpfully adds the Message-Id header
before the ACL kicks in - that burnt me on one box. [You could test
for a message ID that looks like one of your own]
Nigel.
--
[ Nigel Metheringham Nigel.Metheringham@??? ]
[ - Comments in this message are my own and not ITO opinion/policy - ]
