Re: [Exim] Temporary defer on callouts

Top Page
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Alan J. Flavell
Date:  
To: Exim users list
Subject: Re: [Exim] Temporary defer on callouts
On Sat, 31 Jan 2004, Kevin Reed wrote:

>
> Alan J. Flavell said:
> > By the way, a possibly dumb question: can a spamassassin recipe
> > actually distinguish whether it's dealing with a bounce or with a
> > non-null envelope sender?


> You could create a header that you could then key on that indicates the
> message has a null envelope sender.


Yup, there's always that possibility, isn't there?

But now that I managed to think about it, surely this (viz. in a
spamassassin .cf file) will suffice, won't it?

header  IS_A_BOUNCE        Return-path =~  /^\<\>$/


cheers