[ On Thursday, January 29, 2004 at 09:39:27 (+0000), list-exim-users@??? ("Miquel van Smoorenburg" ) wrote: ]
> Subject: [Exim] Re: SPF
>
> I think it's a bit of a shame. I've read the SPF RFC and the DMP
> RFC and the latter seems to be much more sound.
Neither proposal is technically sound.
> At least it's
> been written by someone who knows who to write an RFC.
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-fecyk-dmp-01.txt
The author still makes false claims and doesn't seem to understand the
purpose, nor the limitations, of the SMTP envelope sender address.
The whole idea of both proposals is based on false assumptions.
--
Greg A. Woods
+1 416 218-0098 VE3TCP RoboHack <woods@???>
Planix, Inc. <woods@???> Secrets of the Weird <woods@???>
