Re: [Exim] SPF

David Woodhouse <dwmw2@???> wrote:
>
>What I'd rather see, I think, is a cryptographic signature of the mail
>itself, which must match a pubkey available in a TXT record in DNS.

I quite like q249 as an idea. I'm implementing something like it here,
mainly to protect against collateral spam.

Tony.
--
f.a.n.finch <dot@???> http://dotat.at/
FORTIES CROMARTY FORTH TYNE DOGGER: NORTHWEST BECOMING CYCLONIC 5 TO 7,
OCCASIONALLY GALE 8. SQUALLY SNOW SNOWERS THEN RAIN OR SLEET. MODERATE OR
GOOD.