On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 09:40:35PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian said:
> Walt Reed [1/7/2004 8:47 PM] :
>
> >As I mentioned in another email, SpamAssassin currently does this. Yes,
> >it's frustrating to no end.
>
> I have not seen it tag DUL listed IPs in this manner.
>
> Do you have a bugzilla # I can look at?
2462 is one that covers it.
Here is an example sending from my DSL machine, though my hosting
provider, to an account on another machine running SA:
Received: from r1m1.servercentral.net ([64.202.101.150])
by mail.knowledgeplex.org with esmtp (Exim 4.22 id 1AYRQh-00085d-2m
for <XXXX@???>; Mon, 22 Dec 2003 09:53:07 -0500
Received: from main.linuxguy.com (pool-64-222-224-169.port.east.verizon.net [64.222.224.169])
by unknown.servercentral.net (8.10.2/8.10.2) with ESMTP id hBMErPn01548
for <XXXX@???>; Mon, 22 Dec 2003 08:53:25 -0600
And the SA report:
0.5 RCVD_IN_NJABL_DIALUP RBL: NJABL: dialup sender did non-local SMTP [64.222.224.169 listed in dnsbl.njabl.org]
0.1 RCVD_IN_NJABL RBL: Received via a relay in dnsbl.njabl.org [64.222.224.169 listed in dnsbl.njabl.org]
0.1 RCVD_IN_SORBS RBL: SORBS: sender is listed in SORBS [64.222.224.169 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net]
