Re: [Exim] Date header line not added in 4.30

On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Frank Elsner wrote:

> On Mon, 22 Dec 2003 14:23:13 GMT Philip Hazel wrote:
> > On Mon, 22 Dec 2003, Giuliano Gavazzi wrote:
>
> [... ]
>
> > > Can you remember why point 56 of 4.30 ChangeLog happened?
> >
> > I am getting too old. This all happened less than a month ago, and I
> > can't remember the detail. Neither do I appear to have any relevant
> > saved messages, except as part of the discussion about resent- headers.
> > However, I think it all arose from that discussion. There was a view
> > that these kinds of header fixup should not happen by default except for
> > messages that originate on the local host, i.e. do not arrive via
> > TCP/IP.
>
> I really suffer from the fact that a Message-Id is not inserted for messages
> coming in over TCP/IP. In case of virus infection it makes it really hard to
> find them in the quarantine, my procedure uses the Message-Id :-(
>
> I really would like the old behavior or a config file option.
>
>
2nded a config option just like PP used to :-)

--
Alan