On Mon, 22 Dec 2003 14:23:13 GMT Philip Hazel wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Dec 2003, Giuliano Gavazzi wrote:
[... ]
> > Can you remember why point 56 of 4.30 ChangeLog happened?
>
> I am getting too old. This all happened less than a month ago, and I
> can't remember the detail. Neither do I appear to have any relevant
> saved messages, except as part of the discussion about resent- headers.
> However, I think it all arose from that discussion. There was a view
> that these kinds of header fixup should not happen by default except for
> messages that originate on the local host, i.e. do not arrive via
> TCP/IP.
I really suffer from the fact that a Message-Id is not inserted for messages
coming in over TCP/IP. In case of virus infection it makes it really hard to
find them in the quarantine, my procedure uses the Message-Id :-(
I really would like the old behavior or a config file option.
Merry Xmas
from _______________________________________________________________
Frank Elsner / c/o Technische Universitaet Berlin |
____________/ ZRZ, Sekr. E-N 50 |
| Einsteinufer 17 |
| Voice: +49 30 314 23897 D-10587 Berlin |
| SMTP : Elsner@??? Germany ______________________|
|_______________________________________________________| Schmidt soll bleiben
