* Kevin Reed [2003-12-21 14:20]: > Thats why an alternative that produces a Deny at SMTP time rather than a
> bounce after the message is received is perferred...
Yeah, and qmail's stock smtpd sucks because because of not
understanding/ignoring this fact.
In my setup a lot of junk will be blocked after RCPT/DATA during the
SMTP session.
> This is unless I am viewing how you are planning on using this type of
> "feature".
I simply do not expect too much mail to come to my dated addresses. And
I have not seen any "address expired" messages in my logs so far.
> Personally, I think it is a cool idea if done right. There are some other
> issues such as timezones, perhaps generating an address that does not make
> it so easy to guess what the real one is... provide a way for users to
> request a temp unique unblocked mail address etc...
You're reaching TMDA now. :) The initial idea was to avoid such a
monster. :)
Best wishes
Kirill
--
Er en viljeserklæring forvansket ved feiltelegrafering, blir den, som har
avgit den, ikke bundet ved erklæringen i den skikkelse, den er kommet frem.
