Re: [Exim] improvments to exim

> well, at least to be able to use the same acl (rich) syntax in routers,
> i.e !senders = : works on acl's but not in routers, also acl's accepts
> more than one 'condition' and routers accept only one, etc ... Using
> different rules often leads to confusion, by now i'm trying to figure how
> to make a router decline for null envelope sender, my first tough was to
> use !senders = : (like I do in acl's), but it does not work.

I too would like to beable to use multiple conditions on routers.
Specifying conditions and preconditions as such would be nice too.

You can check for null senders
senders = ! :

--
Lab tests show that use of micro$oft causes cancer in lab animals