RE: [Exim] exiscan vs. MailScanner

トップ ページ
このメッセージを削除
このメッセージに返信
著者: Rick Cooper
日付:  
To: exim-users
題目: RE: [Exim] exiscan vs. MailScanner

> -----Original Message-----
> From: exim-users-admin@???
> [mailto:exim-users-admin@exim.org]On
> Behalf Of erik.myllymaki@???
> Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2003 1:03 PM
> To: exim-users@???
> Subject: [Exim] exiscan vs. MailScanner
>
>
> pros and cons?
>
> I will be using [Exiscan|MailScanner] with Exim 4.24,
> Spamassassin and
> Sophos Anti Virus
>
> Any and all advice appreciated.
>


I use both. Exim handles the RBLs, ExiScan does the initial virus
checks, removes file types I never want to see (exe, com, etc)
and MailScanner does the anti-spam (SpamAssassin), defanging, and
detailed file removal.

Mailscanner allows you to block files by regex so you can
deny+delete wendy.zip and allow *.zip later. MailScanner allows
you to block on file type so you can block Unix ELF files,
windows/dos executables even if they have a different extension
(and windows will execute x.exe even if it has been renamed
x.mmm)

MailScanner will defang various types of emails, for instance
remove I-Frame sections, forms, Code Base sections, handles TNEF
and various other potentially dangerous malformations

MailScanner also has a fairly robust rules based configuration
for flexibility as well.

In Short, ExiScan is a good front end product for handling simple
obvious things that there is no reason you would ever want to see
and MailScanner is far more flexible and thorough backend product
that does it's job very, very well and let's Exim get back to
what it does better than anything.

Rick