At 10:43 am +0000 2003/12/10, Philip Hazel wrote:
>On Tue, 9 Dec 2003, Wakko Warner wrote:
>
>> A: sender somerandom@???
>> B: contact whereever.com
>> mail from:<> fails
>> mail from:<postmaster@???> works
>> rcpt to:somerandom@???
>> C: notices the connection and does a callout for postmaster@???
>> At this point mail from:<> should not fail.
>
>Can you rely on every implementation of callback getting this right?
>What if somebody has a callback scheme that doesn't use <>? I'd rather
>not run the risk of hitting one that gets it wrong.
the problem is when two that get it wrong do hit each other, isn't it...?
Anyway, who cares, tough on those who don't accept <>.
Giuliano
