On Thu, 4 Dec 2003, David Woodhouse wrote:
> Your fix for this differs from mine. It accepts IPv6 literals even when
> IPv6 isn't configured in -- which is OK, I suppose -- but it also
> accepts IPv4 addresses with of the form [IPv4:xx.xx.xx.xx], and IPv6
> addresses _without_ the 'IPv6:' prefix; neither of which I see
> documented in RFC2821. Is this intentional permissiveness?
Yes. The latter for backwards compatibility.
--
Philip Hazel University of Cambridge Computing Service,
ph10@??? Cambridge, England. Phone: +44 1223 334714.
Get the Exim 4 book: http://www.uit.co.uk/exim-book
