On Fri, 2003-09-26 at 10:21 +0100, Philip Hazel wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Sep 2003, David Woodhouse wrote:
>
> > EHLO [IPv6:2002:c1ed:8229:10:202:2dff:fe07:a42a]
> > 501 Syntactically invalid EHLO argument(s)
> > EHLO [2002:c1ed:8229:10:202:2dff:fe07:a42a]
> > 250-pentafluge.infradead.org Hello [2002:c1ed:8229:10:202:2dff:fe07:a42a] [2002:c1ed:8229:10:202:2dff:fe07:a42a]
> >
> > Bad Exim. The first one was right... see §4.1.3 of RFC2821.
>
> Thanks. Noted.
Your fix for this differs from mine. It accepts IPv6 literals even when
IPv6 isn't configured in -- which is OK, I suppose -- but it also
accepts IPv4 addresses with of the form [IPv4:xx.xx.xx.xx], and IPv6
addresses _without_ the 'IPv6:' prefix; neither of which I see
documented in RFC2821. Is this intentional permissiveness?
--
dwmw2
