This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
--
Adam Newby wrote:
> If spam filtering (not just RBL, but rules-based filtering) were built
> into Exim, *and a time penalty were introduced on receipt of a spam*, ie
> the connection was held open but Exim failed to respond for a long period,
> might this, if widely used, make it harder for spammers to operate?
This has been thought of before and implemented several times as others
have answered.
What I'd much rather see is a way to keep track of how good or bad
servers which contact me directly are and, based on past first-hand
experience, be able to alter future responses. IE, if certain servers keep
sending me spam or viruses, they get worse and worse service from me until
they're just rejected or teergrubed at connect. Conversely if a server sends
me lots of ham they get preferencial treatment.
--
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
PGP Key: 8B6E99C5 | main connection to the switchboard of souls.
-------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
--
[ Content of type application/pgp-signature deleted ]
--
